Home Science Auditing Privacy in Multi-Tenant RAG under Account Collusion
Science

Auditing Privacy in Multi-Tenant RAG under Account Collusion

Key Points

arXiv:2605.19847v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Multi-tenant RAG services often treat the account as the privacy boundary: each account receives an $(\varepsilon_{\text{acc}},\delta_{\text{acc}})$-DP retrieval guarantee against the tenant index. We show that this framing understates leakage under same-index account collusion. For Gaussian noise-then-select retrieval, $k$ coordinated same-tenant accounts compose to joint leakage $\Theta(\sqrt{k}\,\varepsilon_{\text{acc}})$, not...

arXiv:2605.19847v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Multi-tenant RAG services often treat the account as the privacy boundary: each account receives an $(\varepsilon_{\text{acc}},\delta_{\text{acc}})$-DP retrieval guarantee against the tenant index. We show that this framing understates leakage under same-index account collusion. For Gaussian noise-then-select retrieval, $k$ coordinated same-tenant accounts compose to joint leakage $\Theta(\sqrt{k}\,\varepsilon_{\text{acc}})$, not $\varepsilon_{\text{acc}}$; we give a matching membership-inference attack and validate the predicted $\sqrt{k}$ AUC trend in scalar, top-$K$, trained-embedder, and production-scale HNSW settings. We then give a verifier-runnable audit protocol that attests noise-then-select retrieval and reports $(\textsf{PASS},\varepsilon_{\text{audit}})$ for coalitions up to a declared cap $k_{\max}$, without disclosing the index or changing the retrieval decision rule. The claim is retrieval-channel only: generation-channel leakage and adversarially robust coalition-size estimation are complementary audit predicates.
Auditing Privacy (ORG) Multi-Tenant (ORG)
Originally published by arXiv CS Read original →