Privacy Assessment Framework
No mentions found
This entity hasn't been tracked yet, or Iris is still building its knowledge base.
Related Articles from SNS
LLM-FACETS: A Privacy-Preserving Framework for Evaluating LLM Transparency and Accountability
arXiv:2605.31167v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Assessing whether Large Language Models outputs are factually grounded, epistemically calibrated, and methodologically reproducible is a prerequisite for responsible AI deployment. Yet auditing LLMs remains inaccessible to non-technical practitioners: existing tools require programming expertise and non-trivial environment setup, and cloud-hosted platforms transmit evaluation data to external services, creating barriers for domain experts and...
Persuasive Privacy
Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We propose a novel framework for measuring privacy from a Bayesian game-theoretic perspective. This framework enables the creation of new, purpose-driven privacy definitions that are rigorously justified, while also allowing for the assessment of existing privacy guarantees through game theory. We show that pure and probabilistic differential privacy are special cases of our framework, and provide new interpretations of the post-processing inequality in...
Who Evaluates AI's Social Impacts? Mapping Coverage and Gaps in First and Third Party Evaluations
arXiv:2511.05613v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Foundation models are increasingly central to high-stakes AI systems, and governance frameworks now depend on evaluations to assess their risks and capabilities. Although general capability evaluations are widespread, social impact assessments covering bias, fairness, privacy, environmental costs, and labor remain uneven. To characterize this landscape, we conduct the first comprehensive analysis of social impact evaluation reporting,...
Causal Evaluation of Membership Inference Attacks
arXiv:2602.02819v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Membership Inference Attacks (MIAs) aim to distinguish training points (members) from unseen data (non-members), and are widely used to quantify memorization and assess privacy risks. Standard MIA evaluation requires repeated retraining, which is computationally costly for large models. One-run (single training with randomized data inclusion) and zero-run (post hoc evaluation) methods are often used instead, but their statistical validity...
Causal Evaluation of Membership Inference Attacks
arXiv:2602.02819v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Membership Inference Attacks (MIAs) aim to distinguish training points (members) from unseen data (non-members), and are widely used to quantify memorization and assess privacy risks. Standard MIA evaluation requires repeated retraining, which is computationally costly for large models. One-run (single training with randomized data inclusion) and zero-run (post hoc evaluation) methods are often used instead, but their statistical validity...
Causal Evaluation of Membership Inference Attacks
arXiv:2602.02819v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Membership Inference Attacks (MIAs) aim to distinguish training points (members) from unseen data (non-members), and are widely used to quantify memorization and assess privacy risks. Standard MIA evaluation requires repeated retraining, which is computationally costly for large models. One-run (single training with randomized data inclusion) and zero-run (post hoc evaluation) methods are often used instead, but their statistical validity...
Synthetic but Not Realistic: The Evaluation Challenge in Generative Modelling for Structured Electronic Medical Records
arXiv:2606.08903v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Synthetic healthcare data are widely proposed as privacy-preserving substitutes for real patient data, yet their evaluation remains dominated by statistical similarity and predictive performance that do not reflect clinical validity. We introduce a multi-dimensional evaluation framework grounded in epidemiology, assessing descriptive fidelity, clinical utility, and structural validity, corresponding to descriptive, predictive, and causal...
Benchmarking Empirical Privacy Protection for Adaptations of Large Language Models
arXiv:2606.09401v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent work has applied differential privacy (DP) to adapt large language models (LLMs) for sensitive applications, offering theoretical guarantees. However, its practical effectiveness remains unclear, partly due to LLM pretraining, where overlaps and interdependencies with adaptation data can undermine privacy despite DP efforts. To analyze this issue in practice, we investigate privacy risks under DP adaptations in LLMs using...
Maris: A Formally Verifiable Privacy Policy Enforcement Paradigm for Multi-Agent Collaboration Systems
arXiv:2505.04799v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Multi-agent collaboration systems (MACS), powered by large language models (LLMs), solve complex problems efficiently by leveraging each agent's specialization and communication between agents. However, the inherent exchange of information between agents and their interaction with external environments, such as LLM, tools, and users, inevitably introduces significant risks of sensitive data leakage, including vulnerabilities to attacks such...
Maris: A Formally Verifiable Privacy Policy Enforcement Paradigm for Multi-Agent Collaboration Systems
Announce Type: replace Abstract: Multi-agent collaboration systems (MACS), powered by large language models (LLMs), solve complex problems efficiently by leveraging each agent's specialization and communication between agents. However, the inherent exchange of information between agents and their interaction with external environments, such as LLM, tools, and users, inevitably introduces significant risks of sensitive data leakage, including vulnerabilities to attacks such as eavesdropping...