the Argumentative Theory of Reasoning
No mentions found
This entity hasn't been tracked yet, or Iris is still building its knowledge base.
Related Articles from SNS
Social Reasoning in Machines: Investigating Collective Truth-Seeking Dynamics in Large Language Model Debate
arXiv:2605.30391v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Human reasoning has long been theorised to operate socially, not through isolated individual cognition, but through collective adversarial discourse, a framework known as the Argumentative Theory of Reasoning (ATR). Rather than relying on individual "intellectualist reasoners" as the primary vehicle for truth-seeking, ATR reconceptualises truth as an emergent property of social epistemology: the product of imperfect individual reasoning refined...
Reasoning without Gold Standards: A Proxy-Judge Theory of Autoformalization
Announce Type: new Abstract: Complex reasoning tasks increasingly require systems to produce outputs whose correctness cannot be judged by exact match against a single reference. Autoformalization (AF) is a representative example; it asks a model to translate informal mathematical or logical reasoning into a formally checkable object, yet expert-validated formalizations do not scale beyond toy cases and a single informal argument can admit many valid formal renderings. Progress therefore...
ToMAP: Training Opponent-Aware LLM Persuaders with Theory of Mind
arXiv:2505.22961v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have shown promising potential in persuasion, but existing works on training LLM persuaders are still preliminary. Notably, while humans are skilled in modeling their opponent's thoughts and opinions proactively and dynamically, current LLMs struggle with such Theory of Mind (ToM) reasoning, resulting in limited diversity and opponent awareness. To address this limitation, we introduce Theory of Mind Augmented...
Extending AI for Research to the Humanities: A Multi-Agent Framework for Evidence-Grounded Scholarship
arXiv:2605.30947v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: LLM-based research agents have advanced rapidly in science and engineering, where research is organized around executable experiments, code, and quantitative signals. Humanities scholarship, however, requires a different mode of reasoning: interpretive, evidence-grounded argument over primary sources, where scholarly value depends on faithful quotation, verifiable provenance, and close reading. Existing research agents remain largely...
Extending AI for Research to the Humanities: A Multi-Agent Framework for Evidence-Grounded Scholarship
Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM-based research agents have advanced rapidly in science and engineering, where research is organized around executable experiments, code, and quantitative signals. Humanities scholarship, however, requires a different mode of reasoning: interpretive, evidence-grounded argument over primary sources, where scholarly value depends on faithful quotation, verifiable provenance, and close reading. Existing research agents remain largely optimized for execution and...
Extending AI for Research to the Humanities: A Multi-Agent Framework for Evidence-Grounded Scholarship
arXiv:2605.30947v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: LLM-based research agents have advanced rapidly in science and engineering, where research is organized around executable experiments, code, and quantitative signals. Humanities scholarship, however, requires a different mode of reasoning: interpretive, evidence-grounded argument over primary sources, where scholarly value depends on faithful quotation, verifiable provenance, and close reading. Existing research agents remain largely...
The Frame Problem
The Frame Problem To most AI researchers, the frame problem is the challenge of representing the effects of action in logic without having to represent explicitly a large number of intuitively obvious non-effects. But to many philosophers, the AI researchers' frame problem is suggestive of wider epistemological issues. Is it possible, in principle, to limit the scope of the reasoning required to derive the consequences of an action?
Republicans vs. the Fourteenth Amendment
Subscribe here: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTubeIn this episode of The David Frum Show, The Atlantic’s David Frum opens with his thoughts on the Brexit vote, which was cast 10 years ago this month. David explains why Brexit has not only been a failure but has led to years of political instability in the U.K. in the decade following the British vote to leave the European Union. Then, David is joined by Professor David W. Blight to discuss the blood-soaked aftermath of the Civil War and the...
AI Outperforms Law Professors in Stanford Law Study
A groundbreaking study led by Stanford Law School Professor Julian Nyarko reveals that law professors overwhelmingly prefer AI-generated answers to student questions over responses written by their fellow instructors—a finding that could reshape how legal education is delivered. The study, titled “Law Professors Prefer AI Over Peer Answers,” was conducted with 16 law professors across U.S. law schools and tested whether large language models could serve as effective tutors for contract law...
Overarming America: Game theory explores how fear and social pressure drive gun purchases
Overarming America: Game theory explores how fear and social pressure drive gun purchases Stephanie Baum Scientific Editor Robert Egan Associate Editor A Dartmouth College study is the first to map the interplay of personal choice and social networks that has led to the United States being one of the world's most heavily armed countries, with 120 firearms for every 100 people. The researchers describe in Science Advances how individual incentives to buy firearms can lead to a phenomenon they...