Education
From eye anatomy to navigation: a biologically accurate model of bees polarisation vision
Key Points
Skylight polarisation patterns provide a critical navigational cue for many insects. Bees perceive these patterns through specialised ommatidia in the dorsal rim area of their compound eyes, enabling them to estimate the suns direction and navigate between food sources and the hive. Although polarisation-based navigation has been extensively studied behaviourally, computational models that link DRA anatomy with navigational performance are lacking.
Skylight polarisation patterns provide a critical navigational cue for many insects. Bees perceive these patterns through specialised ommatidia in the dorsal rim area of their compound eyes, enabling them to estimate the suns direction and navigate between food sources and the hive. Although polarisation-based navigation has been extensively studied behaviourally, computational models that link DRA anatomy with navigational performance are lacking. Here, we simulate polarisation vision in honeybees (Apis mellifera) and bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) using real sky polarisation images to capture biologically relevant skylight properties. Our biologically grounded simulation incorporates species-specific DRA anatomy, including ommatidial optical axis directions, photoreceptor receptive fields, and microvillar orientations. We evaluate navigational accuracy and consistency across sun elevations under two distinct, potentially complementary navigational models: the matched filter, which requires scanning across body orientations to identify the solar axis, and the vector-sum model, which generates instantaneous sun azimuth estimates from a single body orientation, making it independent of active scanning. Matched filter errors in estimating solar axis are below 5{degrees} across most sun elevations and in both species. Absolute errors in the vector-sum model are lower for honeybees than bumblebees (median ~10{degrees} and ~30{degrees}, respectively), reflecting differences in DRA anatomy, particularly viewing direction and microvillar arrangement. Both models allow stable course control across most sun elevations in both species, yet the matched filter, being limited to solar axis alignment, only enables positive or negative phototaxis. Overall, this work provides a mechanistic and comparative framework based on realistic DRA anatomy to study polarisation-based navigation, generating testable predictions for insect navigation under natural sky conditions.