Science
Style or Content? Evaluating Style Classifiers with Controlled Content Overlap
Key Points
Announce Type: new Abstract: Style classifiers can use content cues that correlate with style labels in naturally collected data, yet we lack a systematic way to measure this reliance. We study this problem with a controlled content overlap setup built on parallel Bible translations. Specifically, we define the overlap parameter $\alpha$ as the normalized residual of mutual information between content identity and style label, so that it measures how much content is shared across style...
arXiv:2606.07103v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Style classifiers can use content cues that correlate with style labels in naturally collected data, yet we lack a systematic way to measure this reliance. We study this problem with a controlled content overlap setup built on parallel Bible translations. Specifically, we define the overlap parameter $\alpha$ as the normalized residual of mutual information between content identity and style label, so that it measures how much content is shared across style classes: from no shared content ($\alpha=0$) to fully shared content ($\alpha=1$). Cross-overlap evaluation of RoBERTa-based classifiers shows that low-overlap models degrade when content cues are removed, while high-overlap models transfer more robustly. A cross-style content retrieval probe further shows that content becomes less recoverable as $\alpha$ increases, with training dynamics showing this removal occurs gradually. Together, these results suggest that controlled overlap provides a simple diagnostic for separating style learning from content shortcuts.