Home Business & Finance RankGLU: Residual Gated Score Formation for...
Business & Finance

RankGLU: Residual Gated Score Formation for Cross-Sectional Stock Prediction

Key Points

arXiv:2606.08930v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Cross-sectional stock prediction is closer to a ranking problem than to ordinary return-magnitude regression, since portfolio decisions depend on the relative ordering of assets within each trading date. Existing temporal, graph-based, and market-conditioned attention models have improved stock representation learning, yet the final prediction head is often treated as a minor implementation detail. This paper argues that, under...

arXiv:2606.08930v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Cross-sectional stock prediction is closer to a ranking problem than to ordinary return-magnitude regression, since portfolio decisions depend on the relative ordering of assets within each trading date. Existing temporal, graph-based, and market-conditioned attention models have improved stock representation learning, yet the final prediction head is often treated as a minor implementation detail. This paper argues that, under information-coefficient-oriented evaluation, score formation is a critical bottleneck: an over-flexible head can fit unstable return magnitude, whereas an overly linear head may underuse cross-feature interactions. We therefore develop RankGLU, a residual bottleneck gated linear unit for cross-sectional stock ranking. RankGLU keeps a direct linear scoring path and adds a bounded multiplicative branch, thereby preserving a stable ordering route while allowing controlled nonlinear interactions. The method is evaluated on CSI300 and CSI800 under a unified protocol with cross-sectional score normalization and an IC-augmented objective. Multi-seed experiments show that, on CSI300, RankGLU achieves the strongest mean IC among the internally controlled variants, improving from 0.0654+/-0.0052 for the original backbone and 0.0697+/-0.0030 for the ranking-aware backbone to 0.0727+/-0.0037, a gain that is consistent across all five seeds. Its best-seed result also exceeds the corresponding baselines. Ablation results further indicate that removing the GLU prediction head causes the clearest degradation among the tested component changes. Additional relation-path calibrations can produce high single-seed peaks, but their multi-seed behavior is less stable. The evidence suggests that ranking-aware stock models benefit most reliably from bounded residual score formation rather than from indiscriminate architectural expansion.
linear (ORG) CSI300 (LOCATION) CSI800 (ORG) GLU (ORG)
Originally published by arXiv CS Read original →