Home Science Overcoming Decoder Inconsistencies in Whisper for...
Science

Overcoming Decoder Inconsistencies in Whisper for Dravidian and Low-Resource Languages

Key Points

Announce Type: new Abstract: Multilingual ASR models such as Whisper perform well on high-resource languages but exhibit substantially higher Word Error Rates (WER) for Dravidian languages compared to Indo-Aryan ones. Through linguistic and dataset analysis, we show that Dravidian languages have longer words, higher vocabulary diversity, and lower repetition, resulting in sparse token distributions and frequent character-level substitution errors. Baseline fine-tuning further reveals decoder...

arXiv:2606.09535v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multilingual ASR models such as Whisper perform well on high-resource languages but exhibit substantially higher Word Error Rates (WER) for Dravidian languages compared to Indo-Aryan ones. Through linguistic and dataset analysis, we show that Dravidian languages have longer words, higher vocabulary diversity, and lower repetition, resulting in sparse token distributions and frequent character-level substitution errors. Baseline fine-tuning further reveals decoder imbalance between self-attention (linguistic context) and cross-attention (acoustic cues). Although synthetic token-repetition experiments indicate potential gains, they are impractical. Motivated by these observations, we introduce two decoder-level enhancements: Weighted-Attention, which adaptively balances attention sources, and Self-Conditioning, which reinjects intermediate predictions to improve token consistency. Experiments demonstrate consistent WER reductions for low-resource and agglutinative languages.
Dravidian (ORG) Low-Resource Languages arXiv:2606.09535v1 (ORG) Whisper (PERSON) Self-Conditioning (ORG)
Originally published by arXiv CS Read original →