Home UK News UN snub to Germany may well prove costly | Letters
UK News

UN snub to Germany may well prove costly | Letters

Key Points

If the UN has no need of Germany’s voice or influence, it may have no need of its large funding contribution either, writes Michael PfeifferGermany has failed, for the first time, in its bid for a non-permanent seat on the United Nations security council (‘Embarrassing’: pressure on Merz after Germany’s failure to win UN security council seat, 4 June). In New York, the federal republic was defeated by Austria and Portugal – and by a clear margin. Did the countries that...

If the UN has no need of Germany’s voice or influence, it may have no need of its large funding contribution either, writes Michael Pfeiffer

Germany has failed, for the first time, in its bid for a non-permanent seat on the United Nations security council (‘Embarrassing’: pressure on Merz after Germany’s failure to win UN security council seat, 4 June). In New York, the federal republic was defeated by Austria and Portugal – and by a clear margin.

Did the countries that withheld their votes from Germany pause for even a moment to consider the consequences? Did they ask themselves whether it was wise to subject the second‑largest contributor to the UN – responsible for 5.27% of all state contributions – to such a public rebuff? Evidently not. Otherwise Germany would hardly have been so demonstratively humiliated.

Continue reading...
UN (ORG) Germany (LOCATION) Michael PfeifferGermany (PERSON) United Nations (ORG) Merz (PERSON) New York (LOCATION) the federal republic (LOCATION) Austria (LOCATION) Portugal (LOCATION)
Originally published by The Guardian UK Read original →