Health
Massachusetts is close to giving doctors the final say on late abortions
Key Points
Massachusetts is close to giving doctors the final say on late abortions The law would be the latest change to the U.S. abortion landscape that received a shock four years ago when a Supreme Court ruling overturned Roe v. Wade - Bookmark - CommentsGo to comments Massachusetts is moving to grant doctors the final authority on late-term abortions, a legislative change intended to prevent women from being turned away from care. The state Senate adopted the measure on Friday, sending it to...
Massachusetts is close to giving doctors the final say on late abortions
The law would be the latest change to the U.S. abortion landscape that received a shock four years ago when a Supreme Court ruling overturned Roe v. Wade
- Bookmark
- CommentsGo to comments
Massachusetts is moving to grant doctors the final authority on late-term abortions, a legislative change intended to prevent women from being turned away from care.
The state Senate adopted the measure on Friday, sending it to Democratic Governor Maura Healey, a known proponent of strengthening abortion rights.
Under current Massachusetts law, abortion is legal for the first 24 weeks of pregnancy. Beyond this, it is permitted only if a physician deems it necessary for the woman's life, physical or mental health, due to a lethal fetal anomaly, or if the fetus is unlikely to survive outside the uterus.
State Representative Christine Barber highlighted how this framework has led to hospitals refusing abortions late in pregnancy, even in cases where a fetus had suffered a stroke and was not expected to live.
The new legislation seeks to remove this prescriptive list of reasons, instead stipulating that late-term abortions would be permitted solely "based on the professional judgment of the physician."
Opponents say that it would allow abortion until birth — even on healthy fetuses — and that later abortions are more complex and risky for the women.
“While this legislation prioritizes access, it does not prioritize a woman’s safety,” Myrna Maloney Flynn, president of Massachusetts Citizens for Life, said in a video encouraging supporters to tell lawmakers to reject the bill.
Abortion law changes have slowed but not stopped
If Healey signs it, the law would be the latest change to a U.S. abortion landscape that received a shock four years ago after a Supreme Court ruling that overturned Roe v. Wade and allowed states to enforce abortion bans.
Some already had bans on the books as they waited for permission to enforce them, and others adopted bans or restrictions after the ruling. Currently, 13 states are enforcing bans on abortion at all stages of pregnancy, with some exceptions. Another four bar it after about six weeks of pregnancy — which is often before women realize they are pregnant.
Several Democratic-controlled states have moved the other way, adding laws that seek to protect medical providers from prosecution for providing abortion to patients in other states. Massachusetts is among the states that has gone farthest, with a shield law that applies to those who prescribe abortion bills via telehealth to women in states where abortion is banned. Anti-abortion officials in Louisiana and Texas are testing those protections.
Most abortion-related state laws adopted this year have not made for major changes on when or how abortion is allowed.
For instance, a new Colorado law requires colleges that have student health centers to provide abortion pills for students starting in August 2027. Private schools that say it conflicts would their religious beliefs would be exempt.
A new Oklahoma law makes it a felony to buy or sell those pills for the purpose of an unlawful abortion for someone else.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments