Politics
Teenagers overwhelmingly likely to turn off optional social media curfews – poll
Key Points
Teenagers overwhelmingly likely to turn off optional social media curfews – poll The research by Censuswide found 84.6% of 16 to 18-year-olds said they would opt out of the proposed curfews. - Bookmark Most teenagers intend to opt out of the Government’s planned social media curfews, polling has suggested. Sir Keir Starmer unveiled plans for a voluntary curfew for 16 and 17-year-olds in his final weeks in office.
Teenagers overwhelmingly likely to turn off optional social media curfews – poll
The research by Censuswide found 84.6% of 16 to 18-year-olds said they would opt out of the proposed curfews.
- Bookmark
Most teenagers intend to opt out of the Government’s planned social media curfews, polling has suggested.
Sir Keir Starmer unveiled plans for a voluntary curfew for 16 and 17-year-olds in his final weeks in office.
The curfew would prevent teenagers accessing social media sites between midnight and 6am by default, but could be turned off.
The poll by Censuswide found 84.6% of 16-18-year-olds said they would opt out of the proposed curfews.
The poll, conducted on behalf of the Online Responsibility Network, found 45.2% of teenagers said they would turn the curfew off to allow them to speak to friends or family, while another 37.2% would turn it off to watch online content.
Leanne Proctor, regulatory lead at the Online Responsibility Network, said the research suggests a curfew is “unlikely to be enough on its own to prevent online harms”.
She said: “There is no single solution to protecting children online.
“Rather than relying on broad service-level restrictions, greater focus should be placed on design feature-level protections and robust age assurance, helping to ensure young people have age-appropriate experiences without unnecessarily restricting access.”
Announcing the policy last month, ministers also proposed turning of addictive features such as auto-scrolling and algorithmic feeds for young people.
Then-education secretary Bridget Phillipson suggested the voluntary element to curfews could be changed if it was found many teenagers were switching off the default settings.
A report published last month by Meta also found that 90% of teenagers had kept content restrictions applied to their accounts last October in place.
A Government spokesperson said: “Young people will have a choice in how they navigate social media as they grow into adulthood.
“In our national poll, 64% of young people aged 16 to 21 supported restricting children from certain apps at night and our trials found overnight curfews quickly became part of daily routines and helped improve sleep and concentration.
“We are providing strong protections by default while giving 16 and 17-year-olds the ability to decide whether those protections fit their circumstances, recognising they are capable of making informed decisions.”
Munira Wilson, the Liberal Democrats’ education spokeswoman, criticised the Government’s approach, calling for policymakers to “tackle the causes of social media addiction, not just the symptoms”.
She said: “You wouldn’t give an alcoholic a bottle of wine with a screw cap and call it a preventative measure, so why is this Government doing the digital equivalent for young people online?”
Ms Wilson added: “The Liberal Democrats are calling for film-style age ratings, allowing young people to enjoy the best of the online world while giving social media companies a clear incentive to remove addictive design features and harmful content from their platforms.
“Our message is simple – if your platform is designed to drive addiction, you don’t get access to our children.”
[Image text:] QBlack pink
Search
gam-2025-10-26
E#dea
This creator tumed off comments
II