Home › Business & Finance › UK first-time buyers 'paying off mortgages in...
Business & Finance

UK first-time buyers 'paying off mortgages in retirement' to afford homes

UK first-time buyers 'paying off mortgages in retirement' to afford homes
Key Points

UK first-time buyers 'paying off mortgages in retirement' to afford homes New research has found many are taking out long terms to get on the ladder First-time buyers are facing being forced to pay off mortgages in retirement as nearly half take out 35-year terms. Heron Financial analysis seen by Newspage shows that among first-time buyer purchases on its books over the past 12 months to October 2026, almost half, 48%, took out mortgages lasting 35 years or more. With many of these mortgages...

UK first-time buyers 'paying off mortgages in retirement' to afford homes New research has found many are taking out long terms to get on the ladder First-time buyers are facing being forced to pay off mortgages in retirement as nearly half take out 35-year terms. Heron Financial analysis seen by Newspage shows that among first-time buyer purchases on its books over the past 12 months to October 2026, almost half, 48%, took out mortgages lasting 35 years or more. With many of these mortgages running beyond the age of 67, the state pension age currently being phased in, first-time buyers are stretching their loans over extended periods to make monthly repayments more affordable. Many first-time buyers used Help to Buy, where the equity loan had to be repaid alongside the mortgage, while fees kicked in from year six at 1.75% of the loan and rose each year. However, if Prime Minister Andy Burnham's proposed Your First Home, which has just been announced, follows a similar model, buyers could face years more of fees simply because they have taken out a longer mortgage, experts said. The length of the interest-free period and what borrowers will pay afterwards are due to be confirmed in the Budget on October 28. The growing use of longer mortgage terms shows the increasing pressure first-time buyers are facing to keep monthly repayments affordable, industry experts said. Becoming the norm Matt Coulson, founder of Rickmansworth-based Heron Financial, said: "It's becoming the norm, with nearly half now taking terms of 35 years or more. People don't do that casually. They stretch the term because it's the one lever that brings the monthly payment down to something they can afford. "It's the clearest sign of where the squeeze really is: the monthly cost. The trade-off is real. A longer term lowers the payment now but costs far more interest over the life of the loan, and pushes borrowing deeper into your working life, often to retirement. "Your First Home doesn't change that, and may even nudge it further: a smaller deposit means a bigger mortgage and a bigger mortgage leans even harder on a long term to stay affordable. On hidden charges, the one to watch is the equity loan. Under the old Help to Buy it was interest-free for five years and then started charging, so the cost arrives well after the headline deposit help. Factor the whole cost: the term, the interest and the equity loan repayment, well beyond the 2.5% to get in.” Can make sense Sara Palmer, chief distribution officer at Gen H, said 35-year mortgages could “make perfect sense”. She added: "At Gen H, 37% of our first-time buyers have taken terms of at least 35 years. This rises to 64% for 30+ year terms. In this housing market, it's hard to imagine any other way for people to get on the ladder. It's absolutely true that a longer mortgage term can cost significantly more over the term of the mortgage. "But the reality is that this may be worth it for families with no other path to homeownership, with Your First Home or without it. It is tempting to get wrapped up in the numbers, but if a first-time buyer is comfortable making the payments and owning is a priority, it may make perfect sense.” 'Don't fear long terms' One adviser said buyers should not fear the 35-year term – arguing that it could act as a financial safety net. Martin Rayner, financial adviser at Compton Financial Services, said: "We recommend a 35-year term to virtually all first-time buyers. It keeps the committed monthly payment as low as possible, while most mortgages allow borrowers to overpay by up to 10% of the balance each year without penalty. "A 35-year term is the safety net, not the repayment plan. That flexibility matters. Job security is not what it was for previous generations and most buyers will only fix for two or five years, after which they can change the term anyway. Your First Home should not fundamentally change that. “The bigger issue is ensuring buyers understand the true cost of the equity loan. If the Government takes a 20% equity share, you are also giving away 20% of any increase in value. Borrow £40,000 against a £200,000 home and, if it rises to £250,000, you could have £50,000 to repay. If fees or high interest is charged after the interest-free period, buyers need to understand that cheap at the start does not necessarily mean cheap over the long term.” Richard Davidson, mortgage advisor at onlinemortgageadvisor.co.uk, said the real concern was whether buyers could pay off the debt quickly enough. He added: "Long terms are now the norm for many first-time buyers, but the real issue with Your First Home is not that anyone will run a 35-year mortgage to the end, it is that they may not be paying it down fast enough. Like Help to Buy, this equity loan is designed to be temporary, with the idea that once the interest-free period ends and while the fees are generally still lower than mortgage rates, owners have built up enough equity to fold the loan into their mortgage. “Buyers also need to remember the loan is a share of the home, so if prices rise, what they owe rises with it. If it mirrors Help to Buy, the sensible plan is to repay at the five-year mark, or by year ten at the latest, and to run those numbers from day one, because my worry is that some buyers will see it, or be sold it, as free money rather than a debt that needs a clear exit.” Realistic plan needed Tracey Dixon, buy-to-let mortgage specialist and owner of Cardiff-based Pure Mortgage and Protection, said buyers needed clear illustrations of future costs and a realistic repayment plan from the outset. She said: "Getting the keys is only the first hurdle. Buyers also need a realistic way to repay the help that got them through the door. A longer mortgage term can make monthly payments more manageable, but it should be an individual recommendation, with the overall interest cost and retirement plans considered. "My concern with any new equity loan scheme is what happens later. If buyers already need 35 or 40 years to make the mortgage affordable, how will they fund any additional charges and ultimately repay the equity loan? “We should not build affordability around the hope that salaries and house prices will rise. Buyers need clear illustrations of future costs and a realistic repayment plan from the outset. Until the scheme’s full terms are confirmed, a smaller deposit alone is not enough to judge its value. Success should mean sustainable homeownership, not simply more completed purchases.”
UK (LOCATION) Heron Financial (ORG) Newspage (ORG) Andy Burnham (PERSON) Your First Home (ORG) Budget (ORG) Matt Coulson (PERSON) Rickmansworth (LOCATION) First Home (ORG) Sara Palmer (PERSON) Gen H (ORG)
Originally published by Daily Mirror Read original →