Home › Technology › AI Meets Turbulence Modeling: Complex Systems Perspective
Technology

AI Meets Turbulence Modeling: Complex Systems Perspective

Key Points

Announce Type: new Abstract: Despite widespread enthusiasm, applying artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) to turbulence modeling has yielded only modest progress, primarily due to a lack of situation-aware deployment. Data-driven Reynolds-averaged Navier--Stokes (ML-RANS) closures frequently fail to generalize across diverse flow regimes, while scale-resolving simulations (SRS) remain computationally prohibitive.

arXiv:2610.14355v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Despite widespread enthusiasm, applying artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) to turbulence modeling has yielded only modest progress, primarily due to a lack of situation-aware deployment. Data-driven Reynolds-averaged Navier--Stokes (ML-RANS) closures frequently fail to generalize across diverse flow regimes, while scale-resolving simulations (SRS) remain computationally prohibitive. As a result, ML-RANS is often misapplied outside its domain of validity, and ML-SRS is unnecessarily deployed on flows fully amenable to RANS. To guide optimal AI/ML deployment, we propose a turbulence taxonomy map parameterized by degrees of freedom ($Re$) and the degree of non-equilibrium ($SK/\epsilon$). By applying Weaver's well-recognized complexity framework, we classify turbulence into distinct physical regimes. This categorization identifies where local ML-RANS surrogates can generalize, clarifies where explicit scale resolution is physically mandatory, and highlights where physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) are most effective. Ultimately, this perspective establishes a physics-grounded framework for the flow-aware, successful deployment of AI/ML in turbulence.
AI Meets Turbulence Modeling: (ORG) AI/ML (ORG) Reynolds (ORG) Navier (ORG) Stokes (PERSON) SRS (ORG) ML-SRS (ORG) Weaver (ORG)
Originally published by arXiv Physics Read original →