Home › Entertainment › I never authorized an integration that scans my secrets
Entertainment

I never authorized an integration that scans my secrets

Key Points

Repository navigation i never authorized an integration that scans my secrets #49314 Description Type of issue Other (issue in content formatting, broken link or image, non-working widget) Problem description This is a pretty severe invasion of privacy. I never authorized any integrations or plugins for scanning secrets and sending them up the line, even if they are hashed or not. This mechanism could be abused by a malicious threat actor with access to the home assistant github repos in a...

Repository navigation i never authorized an integration that scans my secrets #49314 Description Type of issue Other (issue in content formatting, broken link or image, non-working widget) Problem description This is a pretty severe invasion of privacy. I never authorized any integrations or plugins for scanning secrets and sending them up the line, even if they are hashed or not. This mechanism could be abused by a malicious threat actor with access to the home assistant github repos in a variety of ways. how do i turn this thing off? Suggested solution make this an opt-in feature, do not just opt people in to scanning for secrets with a system they were not aware existed. URL https://www.home-assistant.io/more-info/pwned-passwords/ Version 2026.10.1 How do you know the suggested solution is correct? No response Additional information No response Leaving this closed since this repository is for our documentation, but I want to follow up, because my earlier replies were more dismissive than this deserved. My apologies. As it turns out, this check can already be turned off after all: ha security options --pwned=false To be transparent: this check isn't new, it has been part of the Supervisor for years. It checks app options that are marked as passwords. A recent release fixed the warning that surfaces it, which is why you're seeing it now. Privacy was a design requirement for this feature from the start, which is why your secrets never leave your system. The Supervisor hashes them locally and sends only the first 5 characters of th… Activity Oh hi there 👋 It is not an invasion of privacy and there are sure other apps out there doing this (most notably the 1Password password manager). Your passwords are never send out, never published. Read more about it here: https://blog.cloudflare.com/validating-leaked-passwords-with-k-anonymity/ As a matter of fact, it is designed to handled these types of data with privacy in mind, see also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K-anonymity If anything, learn from the output, because the secrets you are using are listed in the password databases and thus easily "hackable". ../Frenck Blogging my personal ramblings at frenck.dev Reacted by xor eax,eaxI run Phobos Group, and I travel all over the world giving presentations about security. I am very well acquainted with HIBP, and have met troy in the past. I helped deploy 1password at twitter when I was their sole red-team staff member in 2011.I am still not happy that home assistant, without my opt-in, without my permission, scanned my HA installation and send stuff up the line to HIBP. This should be an opt-in feature, and not something that 'just happens'. As a red teamer, I can give you a list as long as my arm about how I could abuse this to loot credentials from every HA install on the planet.Reacted by Daniel W. Cromptonthis issue is not closed until I am satisfied that HA is not taking things off my system without my permission and sending them to a 3rd party Reacted by Daniel W. CromptonThis issue is closed as won't fix. Sorry. ../Frenck Reacted by Latte macchiatoReacted by Ryan Carter, Ben Lee, Ciarán Ainsworth, Daniel W. Crompton, xor eax,eax and Jamie BlissHi, long time HA user here. Please re-open this issue and address the question of how to disable this. If a method to disable it is not currently implemented, please consider implementing this rather than insisting the userbase accept this and take your word on it. This response feels extremely dismissive and as a user of this platform I feel secondhand offended by it as I share the exact same concerns as OP and do not believe the response here adequately addressed the concerns. If there is no interest in addressing this reasonably, please let us know so we can uninstall and fork. Reacted by Daniel W. CromptonReacted by Justin Myersplease let us know so we can uninstall and fork Sorry, these are not statements we can work with. Doing such threats and trying to intimidate it not going to bring you anywhere. If you want to do a feature request, that is fine, we have places for that. This report is on our documentation. There is no amount of documentation I can adjust to adjust this or address this. Thus closed as won't fix. If this is all reason for you to uninstall and fork... 🤷 So be it, it is open source after all. ../Frenck Blogging my personal ramblings at frenck.dev It is not an invasion of privacy Yes. Yes it is. /whitehat hacker - locked as too heated and limited conversation to collaborators on Oct 16, 2026 Leaving this closed since this repository is for our documentation, but I want to follow up, because my earlier replies were more dismissive than this deserved. My apologies. As it turns out, this check can already be turned off after all: ha security options --pwned=false To be transparent: this check isn't new, it has been part of the Supervisor for years. It checks app options that are marked as passwords. A recent release fixed the warning that surfaces it, which is why you're seeing it now. Privacy was a design requirement for this feature from the start, which is why your secrets never leave your system. The Supervisor hashes them locally and sends only the first 5 characters of the SHA-1 hash to Have I Been Pwned. HIBP returns every hash starting with that prefix, and the matching happens on your own instance. You can see exactly what it does here: https://github.com/home-assistant/supervisor/blob/main/supervisor/utils/pwned.py You are right that our documentation should have explained this, including how to turn it off. We'll get that page updated. ../Frenck Blogging my personal ramblings at frenck.dev Metadata Metadata Assignees Labels Type Fields Priority
1Password (ORG) Phobos Group (ORG) HIBP (ORG) troy (LOCATION) twitter (ORG) Daniel W. Cromptonthis (PERSON) HA (ORG)
Originally published by Hacker News Read original →