Science
'Stupendously large' primordial black holes ruled out as a dark matter source
Key Points
November 8, 2026 report 'Stupendously large' primordial black holes ruled out as a dark matter source Sam Jarman Author Lisa Lock Scientific Editor Robert Egan Senior Editor Primordial black holes are hypothetical objects that could have formed directly from dense clumps of matter in the very early universe. If they exist, their dramatic origins would set them apart from the black holes we see today, which form when massive stars collapse. Some theories suggest that "stupendously large"...
November 8, 2026 report
'Stupendously large' primordial black holes ruled out as a dark matter source
Sam Jarman
Author
Lisa Lock
Scientific Editor
Robert Egan
Senior Editor
Primordial black holes are hypothetical objects that could have formed directly from dense clumps of matter in the very early universe. If they exist, their dramatic origins would set them apart from the black holes we see today, which form when massive stars collapse. Some theories suggest that "stupendously large" primordial black holes could account for a significant share of the universe's elusive dark matter.
Yet new calculations by Nicholas Leister at the Mainz Institute for Theoretical Physics and colleagues show that even if these immense objects do exist, they can't make up any meaningful fraction of dark matter.
Their research has been published in Physical Review Letters.
Stupendously large
Dark matter is thought to make up around 85% of the matter in the universe—but despite decades of intensive searching, physicists still don't know what it is really made from. One proposed candidate is a population of primordial black holes, each weighing at least 100 billion times as much as the sun. Named "stupendously large" black holes, these bodies would be even more massive than the largest supermassive black holes found at the centers of galaxies including the Milky Way.
In their study, Leister's team tested this possibility from a new angle. If primordial black holes were scattered randomly through space, some regions would contain more of them than others, purely by chance.
At first, each surplus of black holes would be balanced by a slight shortage of radiation. But as the universe expanded and its radiation thinned out, this balance would break down. The result would be patchy variations in the amount of dark matter relative to radiation.
Searching the Big Bang's afterglow
After calculating the resulting strengths of these variations, the team compared their predictions with limits set by measurements of the cosmic microwave background (CMB). This subtle microwave signal is the faint afterglow of the Big Bang and can tell us how galaxies are spread across the largest scales of the universe. The fewer and heavier the black holes, the more uneven their random scattering becomes.
Through their analysis, Leister's team found that a substantial population of stupendously large primordial black holes would leave the balance between dark matter and radiation far too uneven.
This patchiness would imprint distinctive patterns on the CMB, but these patterns clearly aren't present in the signal. The result also challenges suggestions that primordial black holes helped seed the surprisingly massive early galaxies spotted by the James Webb Space Telescope.
Tightening dark matter theories
The study doesn't rule out primordial black holes in this mass range altogether. Since the team assumed that all the black holes share the same mass, populations with a wide range of masses still need to be explored before their calculations can be fully conclusive. All the same, their results place tight new limits on how much these objects could contribute to dark matter.
With upcoming CMB experiments, including LiteBIRD and the Simons Observatory, the researchers predict that these limits would be tightened even further. They also hope to extend their analysis to even heavier black holes by searching for the gravitational waves that would have been released as they formed. Together, these efforts could ultimately help to narrow the search for the true identity of dark matter.
Written for you by our author Sam Jarman, edited by Lisa Lock, and fact-checked and reviewed by Robert Egan—this article is the result of careful human work. We rely on readers like you to keep independent science journalism alive. If this reporting matters to you, please consider a donation (especially monthly). You'll get an ad-free account as a thank-you.
Publication details
Christopher Gerlach et al., Closing the Mass Window for Stupendously Large Black Holes, Physical Review Letters (2026). DOI: 10.1103/qlf9-thf4. On arXiv: arxiv.org/abs/2508.08238
Journal information: Physical Review Letters , arXiv
© 2026 Science X Network