Home Business & Finance Clustering-enhanced adaptive Benders decomposition for...
Business & Finance

Clustering-enhanced adaptive Benders decomposition for energy systems planning optimization

Key Points

arXiv:2606.00388v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: High-resolution energy system capacity expansion models (CEMs) for energy transition planning often result in large-scale mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) formulations. Benders decomposition (BD) offers a scalable solution approach by iteratively solving a master problem (MP) for investment decisions and multiple subproblems (SPs) for operational decisions. However, accumulated Benders cuts generated by the SPs can make MP solution a...

arXiv:2606.00388v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: High-resolution energy system capacity expansion models (CEMs) for energy transition planning often result in large-scale mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) formulations. Benders decomposition (BD) offers a scalable solution approach by iteratively solving a master problem (MP) for investment decisions and multiple subproblems (SPs) for operational decisions. However, accumulated Benders cuts generated by the SPs can make MP solution a major computational bottleneck. Incomplete SP parallelization can also introduce further bottlenecks when SPs exceed available CPUs. We develop clustering-enhanced BD methods to address these challenges, by using clustering to group similar SPs for: a) aggregated Benders cut construction and b) identification of representative SPs to be solved most frequently. For grouped-cuts, we examine two adaptive formulations based on dual variables and a fixed-grouping formulation based on exogenous time-series inputs. We evaluate these methods in an electricity-sector CEM across varying system sizes, temporal SP lengths, inter-SP coupling strengths represented by CO2 policy, computational resources, and stochastic settings. Relative to a benchmark regularized multi-cut formulation, adaptive grouped cuts outperform fixed grouping and provide substantial benefits under weak inter-temporal coupling. The largest gains occur in larger systems with shorter SP horizons, where the MP accounts for a greater share of runtime. Their effectiveness declines under strong inter-temporal coupling, such as annual CO2 emissions limits, where the benchmark multi-cut performs best. The representative-SP method outperforms the benchmark under limited parallelization when SP solution dominates runtime. Overall, the preferred BD strategy depends on inter-SP coupling strength and whether computational burden lies in the MP or the SPs.
linear programming (ORG) MILP (ORG) CEM (ORG) SP (ORG) SP horizons (ORG)
Originally published by arXiv CS Read original →