Home Knowledge Base Critical Evaluation

Critical Evaluation

No mentions found

This entity hasn't been tracked yet, or Iris is still building its knowledge base.

Related Articles from SNS

Critical evaluation of PINN for FWD inverse analysis and differentiable FEM as an alternative

Announce Type: new Abstract: Automatic-differentiation-based inverse analysis methods, including physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) and differentiable programming, have recently shown great promise due to their ability to compute accurate gradients and convergence efficiency. However, their applicability to falling weight deflectometer (FWD) backcalculation remains unexplored. This study critically evaluates PINN-based inverse analysis for a multilayer pavement system and investigates...

arXiv CS 7d ago

Ten Headache Specialists versus Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Literature Summarization: A Critical Evaluation and Comparison

arXiv:2606.05436v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Summarizing the latest medical literature to guide clinical decision-making is essential for evidence-based medicine and high-quality patient care. Yet clinicians face increasing challenges due to limited time with patients and a rapidly growing volume of published articles. Although retrieval-augmented large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in clinical summarization, human evaluations of their effectiveness in synthesizing broader...

arXiv CS 5d ago

Hybrid CNN-LSTM Framework for Intelligent Cyber Attack Detection and Prevention in U.S. Critical Digital Infrastructure: A Comparative Machine Learning Evaluation on CSE-CIC-IDS2018

Announce Type: new Abstract: Digital infrastructure is growing at a rapid pace in the United States, and as a result, exposure to advanced cyber threats to critical sectors including healthcare, finance, transportation, energy and government systems is growing. The traditional cybersecurity approaches, including signature-based intrusion detection systems, have become less effective against today's cyber attacks, as they are unable to detect unknown and changing attacks in real time. To...

arXiv CS 5d ago

Preference-Aware Rubric Learning for Personalized Evaluation

Announce Type: new Abstract: As Large Language Models (LLMs) evolve from general-purpose assistants to user-centric agents, personalization has become central to aligning model behavior with individual preferences, making the evaluation of personalized alignment a critical bottleneck. Existing evaluation methods-ranging from automatic metrics to LLM-as-a-judge approaches-fail to capture subjective, user-specific preferences embedded in long-term interaction histories.

arXiv CS 9d ago

Benchmarking Emergent Coordination in Large-Scale LLM Populations: An Evaluation Framework on the MoltBook Archive

arXiv:2603.03555v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: As multi-agent Large Language Model (LLM) systems scale, evaluating their emergent coordination dynamics becomes increasingly critical. However, current evaluation paradigms-focused on single agents or small, explicitly structured groups-fail to capture the self-organization and viral information dynamics that arise in large, decentralized populations. We introduce a systematic evaluation framework to benchmark role specialization,...

arXiv CS 5d ago

AnyAudio-Judge: A Dynamic Rubric-Based Benchmark and Evaluator for Audio Instruction Following

arXiv:2606.03116v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The rapid advancement of instruction-guided audio generation has highlighted the critical need for robust alignment evaluation. Current automated evaluation methods heavily rely on holistic scoring from general-purpose large language models, which struggle to decouple complex instructions, lack interpretability, and fail to capture fine-grained attribute mismatches. To address this, we introduce a novel dynamic rubric-based evaluation...

arXiv CS 7d ago

RadOT-Eval: Auditable Structured-Evidence Transport for Radiology Report Evaluation

arXiv:2606.08769v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Automatic evaluation is critical for high-stakes text generation, where errors often involve omitted findings, hallucinated content, polarity reversals, location changes, uncertainty mismatches, and temporal-comparison errors rather than low surface similarity alone. Radiology report generation provides a challenging test case because generated reports must preserve structured clinical evidence across sources. We present RadOT-Eval, an...

arXiv CS 1d ago

Beyond Tool Adoption: A Practical Five-Stage Developmental Continuum for AI Literacy in Higher Education

arXiv:2606.00038v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We propose a five-stage AI Literacy Continuum for higher education consisting of Not Yet Engaged, Uncritical Use, Informed Use, Critical Evaluation, and Improvement. The continuum addresses a gap in existing AI literacy frameworks, which define competencies but provide limited guidance for diagnosing learner starting points and developmental progression. Drawing on design-based implementation across credit-bearing courses and intensive...

arXiv CS 6d ago

AgentDisCo: Towards Disentanglement and Collaboration in Open-ended Deep Research Agents

arXiv:2605.11732v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: In this paper, we present AgentDisCo, a novel Disentangled and Collaborative agentic architecture that formulates deep research as an adversarial optimization problem between information exploration and exploitation. Unlike existing approaches that conflate these two processes into a single module, AgentDisCo employs a critic agent to evaluate generated outlines and refine search queries, and a generator agent to retrieve updated results...

arXiv CS 5d ago

Illusions of the Gold Standard: A Large-scale Analysis of Human Evaluation Protocols for Long-form Text Generation

arXiv:2606.07936v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Human evaluation plays a critical role in assessing the quality of generated text. However, the reliability and reproducibility of these evaluations depend on transparent and well-documented protocols -- details that are frequently missing in current practice. In this work, we conduct a large-scale analysis of human evaluation protocols for evaluating long-form generation tasks in *CL conference publications from 2023--2025, including a full...

arXiv CS 1d ago