LLM RL
No mentions found
This entity hasn't been tracked yet, or Iris is still building its knowledge base.
Related Articles from SNS
Rethinking the Divergence Regularization in LLM RL
Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) has become a key component of post-training large language models (LLMs). In practice, LLM RL is often off-policy because of training-inference mismatch and policy staleness, making trust-region control essential for stable optimization. Mainstream methods such as PPO and GRPO approximate this control with a ratio-clipping mechanism, but the importance ratio can be a poor proxy for distributional shift in long-tailed vocabularies.
Schedule-Level Shared-Prefix Reuse for LLM RL Training
Announce Type: replace Abstract: GRPO-based LLM post-training commonly samples multiple trajectories from the same prompt and then trains on the resulting group. In long-context GRPO workloads, this shared prompt-side prefix can contain retrieved passages, visual tokens, tool schemas, system instructions, or task context, while the full rollout group is still too large to pack into one training microbatch. Standard dense trainers therefore recompute the same prefix forward and backward for...
Schedule-Level Shared-Prefix Reuse for LLM RL Training
Announce Type: replace Abstract: GRPO- and PPO-style LLM post-training commonly sample multiple trajectories from the same prompt and then train on the resulting group. In long-context RL workloads, this shared prompt-side prefix can contain retrieved passages, visual tokens, tool schemas, system instructions, or task context, while the full rollout group is still too large to pack into one training microbatch. Standard dense trainers therefore recompute the same prefix forward and backward...
Schedule-Level Shared-Prefix Reuse for LLM RL Training
arXiv:2606.01143v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: GRPO- and PPO-style LLM post-training commonly sample multiple trajectories from the same prompt and then train on the resulting group. In long-context RL workloads, this shared prompt-side prefix can contain retrieved passages, visual tokens, tool schemas, system instructions, or task context, while the full rollout group is still too large to pack into one training microbatch. Standard dense trainers therefore recompute the same prefix...
When Does Multi-Agent RL Improve LLM Workflows? Workflow, Scale, and Policy-Sharing Tradeoffs
Announce Type: replace Abstract: Multi-agent LLM workflows route inference through specialized roles to lift end-task accuracy, but jointly training those roles with reinforcement learning is unstable in ways that are poorly understood. We study when end-to-end RL training of multi-agent LLM workflows improves over their base models, comparing Shared-Policy training, where all roles update one policy, with Isolated-Policy training, where each role has its own parameters. Our experimental...
Beyond Two-Stage Training: Cooperative SFT and RL for LLM Reasoning
arXiv:2509.06948v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) are two widely used post-training paradigms for improving the reasoning ability of large language models (LLMs). Recent methods attempt to integrate SFT and RLVR in a single stage by reweighting or scheduling their objectives. However, such coupling can be counterproductive because supervised updates are not uniformly beneficial for reward optimization.
DistFlow: A Fully Distributed RL Framework for Scalable and Efficient LLM Post-Training
arXiv:2507.13833v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Effectively scaling Reinforcement Learning (RL) is crucial for enhancing the reasoning and alignment of Large Language Models. The massive data and complex execution flows inherent in these tasks require a distributed architecture capable of efficient scaling. However, to simplify programming and dependency management, mainstream frameworks often rely on a centralized architecture where a single node dispatches both control and data.
RL Excursions during Pre-Training: Re-examining Policy Optimization for LLM training
arXiv:2606.04272v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The standard LLM training pipeline applies reinforcement learning (RL) only after pre-training and supervised fine-tuning (SFT). We question this status quo by training a LLM from scratch and applying RL, SFT, and SFT followed by RL directly to intermediate pre-training checkpoints. We find that RL is effective very early, and often matches the full SFT$\to$RL pipeline early as well.
StepPO: Step-Aligned Policy Optimization for Agentic Reinforcement Learning
arXiv:2604.18401v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Agentic reinforcement learning (RL) is emerging as a critical post-training paradigm for improving LLM agent capabilities. Existing RL algorithms for LLMs largely follow the token-centric paradigm as in RLHF and RLVR, where tokens serve as the basic units for modeling and optimization. However, this paradigm introduces a granularity mismatch in agentic RL, as it optimizes token-level predictions while LLM agents make step-level decisions...
StepPO: Step-Aligned Policy Optimization for Agentic Reinforcement Learning
Announce Type: replace Abstract: Agentic reinforcement learning (RL) is emerging as a critical post-training paradigm for improving LLM agent capabilities. Existing RL algorithms for LLMs largely follow the token-centric paradigm as in RLHF and RLVR, where tokens serve as the basic units for modeling and optimization. However, this paradigm introduces a granularity mismatch in agentic RL, as it optimizes token-level predictions while LLM agents make step-level decisions through cycles of...