Prediction-Powered Inference
No mentions found
This entity hasn't been tracked yet, or Iris is still building its knowledge base.
Related Articles from SNS
Industrializing Prediction-Powered Inference: The GLIDE Library for Reliable GenAI and Agentic Systems Evaluation
arXiv:2605.31278v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reliable evaluation of agentic systems requires unbiased estimates with valid uncertainty, but standard practice navigates between costly human annotation and biased LLM-as-judge proxies. Prediction-powered inference (PPI) combines both into debiased estimates with valid confidence intervals, yet its various methods remain scattered across papers under partial implementations. We introduce GLIDE, an open-source Python library that unifies...
Industrializing Prediction-Powered Inference: The GLIDE Library for Reliable GenAI and Agentic Systems Evaluation
arXiv:2605.31278v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Reliable evaluation of agentic systems requires unbiased estimates with valid uncertainty, but standard practice navigates between costly human annotation and biased LLM-as-judge proxies. Prediction-powered inference (PPI) combines both into debiased estimates with valid confidence intervals, yet its various methods remain scattered across papers under partial implementations. We introduce GLIDE, an open-source Python library that unifies...
Statistically Reliable LLM-Based Ranking Evaluation via Prediction-Powered Inference
arXiv:2606.05308v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: With PRECISE, we extended Prediction-Powered Inference to produce bias-corrected estimates of ranking evaluation metrics by combining a small human-labeled set with a large LLM-judged set. PPI is provably unbiased regardless of the LLM judge's error profile. We make it applicable to hierarchical metrics like Precision@K, where annotations are per-document but the metric is per-query, by reducing the output-space computation from O(2^|C|) to O(2^K).
PRECISE: Reducing the Bias of LLM Evaluations Using Prediction-Powered Ranking Estimation
Announce Type: cross Abstract: Evaluating the quality of search, ranking and RAG systems traditionally requires a significant number of human relevance annotations. In recent times, several deployed systems have explored the usage of Large Language Models (LLMs) as automated judges for this task while their inherent biases prevent direct use for metric estimation. We present a statistical framework extending Prediction-Powered Inference (PPI) that combines minimal human annotations with LLM...
Generative Augmented Inference
arXiv:2604.14575v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large language models enable inexpensive AI-generated annotations, but using them reliably for causal inference remains challenging. Naively pooling AI and human data induces bias, while existing methods such as Prediction-Powered Inference (PPI; Angelopoulos et al., 2023a) treat AI outputs as proxies of true labels -- an assumption often violated for generative model outputs in practice. We propose Generative Augmented Inference (GAI), a...