Process Reward Agents
No mentions found
This entity hasn't been tracked yet, or Iris is still building its knowledge base.
Related Articles from SNS
Process Reward Agents for Steering Knowledge-Intensive Reasoning
arXiv:2604.09482v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Reasoning in knowledge-intensive domains remains challenging as intermediate steps are often not locally verifiable: unlike math or code, evaluating step correctness may require synthesizing clues across large external knowledge sources. As a result, subtle errors can propagate through reasoning traces, potentially never to be detected. Prior work has proposed process reward models (PRMs), including retrieval-augmented variants, but these...
StainFlow: Entity-Stain Tracking and Evidence Linking for Process Rewards in GUI Agents
arXiv:2606.07027v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement Learning (RL) has become a promising approach for improving GUI Agents in long-horizon, stochastic digital environments, but trajectory-level success feedback is too sparse to provide reliable credit assignment for intermediate exploration steps. To mitigate this issue, recent studies introduce Process Reward Models (PRMs), which provide finer-grained training feedback through global milestone verification or local step-level...
ARBOR: Online Process Rewards via a Reusable Rubric Buffer for Search Agents
arXiv:2606.03239v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM-based search agents are trained predominantly with outcome-only reward, leaving the search process itself unsupervised. This signal degenerates on outcome-homogeneous groups where all sampled trajectories share the same correctness, yielding zero within-group advantage and no gradient. Existing process supervision either trains a costly verifier or generates per-query rubrics that are inconsistent across queries and discarded after one use.
LongTraceRL: Learning Long-Context Reasoning from Search Agent Trajectories with Rubric Rewards
Announce Type: new Abstract: Long-context reasoning remains a central challenge for large language models, which often fail to locate and integrate key information in extensive distracting content. Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has shown promise for this task, yet existing methods are limited by low-confusability distractors and sparse, outcome-only reward signals that cannot supervise intermediate reasoning steps. To address these issues, we introduce...
Self-evolving LLM agents with in-distribution Optimization
arXiv:2606.07367v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently emerged as powerful controllers for interactive agents in complex environments, yet training them to perform reliable long-horizon decision making remains a fundamental challenge. A key difficulty lies in credit assignment: agents often receive delayed rewards only at the end of episodes. In this paper, we propose Q-Evolve, a self-evolving framework for LLM agents that unifies automatic process-reward...
AgentProcessBench: Diagnosing Step-Level Process Quality in Tool-Using Agents
arXiv:2603.14465v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: While Large Language Models (LLMs) have evolved into tool-using agents, they remain brittle in long-horizon interactions. Unlike mathematical reasoning where errors are often rectifiable via backtracking, tool-use failures frequently induce irreversible side effects, making accurate step-level verification critical. However, existing process-level benchmarks are predominantly confined to closed-world mathematical domains, failing to capture...
Policy-Conditioned Counterfactual Credit for Verifiable Reinforcement Learning of Long-Horizon Language Agents
arXiv:2606.05263v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards improves reasoning and tool use, yet long-horizon language agents still learn unsupported evidence chains, belief drift, and shortcut actions that satisfy terminal checks. Existing process rewards are mostly correlational: they reward retrieval-, reflection-, or verification-like steps without estimating whether the step contributes to final verified success under a specified intervention. We...
Who Deserves the Reward? SHARP: Shapley Credit-based Optimization for Multi-Agent System
arXiv:2602.08335v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Integrating Large Language Models (LLMs) with external tools via multi-agent systems offers a promising new paradigm for decomposing and solving complex problems. However, training these systems remains notoriously difficult due to the credit assignment challenge, as it is often unclear which specific functional agent is responsible for the success or failure of decision trajectories. Existing methods typically rely on sparse or globally...
Retrieval, Reward, and Training Protocols: What Matters in Training Search Agents?
Announce Type: replace Abstract: Search agents powered by large language models can autonomously decompose queries, retrieve information, and synthesize answers through multi-step reasoning. However, the rapid growth of training methods has outpaced controlled comparison: existing works differ in retrieval corpora, reward designs, and training protocols, making it unclear what actually drives improvements. We present a controlled empirical study that isolates three under-explored dimensions...
Memory Beyond Recall: A Dual-Process Cognitive Memory System for Self-Evolving LLM Agents
Announce Type: new Abstract: Long-term memory for an LLM agent is more than retrieving the right passage at the right time. Current memory systems collapse belief revision, causal coupling, and cross-domain abstraction into a single retrieval surface tuned for surface recall, and consequently struggle on implicit personalisation that requires reasoning over how a user has evolved. We propose DCPM, which reorganises agent memory along a cognitive capability hierarchy ascending from raw inputs...