the Lexical Alignment Score
No mentions found
This entity hasn't been tracked yet, or Iris is still building its knowledge base.
Related Articles from SNS
Fully Automated Identification of Lexical Alignment and Preference-Stage Shifts in Large Language Models
arXiv:2606.03165v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The language used by digital chat assistants such as ChatGPT can diverge from human expectations (misalignment). Research, mostly on Scientific English, has described both what divergences occur and, to some extent, why, linking them to the training stage of human preference learning. Yet, existing approaches rely on manual curation.
Grounded but Misleading: Evaluating Semantic Alignment in AI-Generated Security Explanations
arXiv:2602.05056v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Online scams increasingly leverage fluent and context-aware social engineering strategies, creating growing demand for AI systems that explain why a message may be risky. However, explanations that cite detector-derived evidence may still semantically weaken or redirect the intended risk interpretation. We introduce VEXA: Verifying Semantic Explanation Alignment, a controlled testbed for studying the gap between lexical grounding and...
DAL-PCQA: Enabling Distortion-Level and Language-Driven Reasoning for Point Cloud Quality Assessment
arXiv:2606.07938v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Point Cloud Quality Assessment (PCQA) methods typically predict scalar Mean Opinion Scores (MOS), which quantify overall perceptual degradation but do not reveal its causes. In contrast, human observers naturally reason in terms of specific distortions such as blur, color shifts, point density changes, missing regions, and geometric deformations. To close this gap, we introduce DAL-PCQA, a distortion-aware, language-annotated dataset for PCQA.
ECI: Effective Contrastive Information to Evaluate Hard-Negatives
arXiv:2603.20990v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Hard-negative source selection for dense retrieval is usually decided only after fine-tuning and downstream evaluation. We propose Effective Contrastive Information (ECI), a training-free diagnostic that ranks candidate negative sources using frozen target-encoder embeddings. ECI is training-free, not label-free: each scored example requires a query, a labeled positive, and an explicit candidate negative.
$\mathrm{ECI}_{\mathrm{sem}}$: Semantic Residual Effective Contrastive Information for Evaluating Hard Negatives
arXiv:2603.20990v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Hard-negative source selection for dense retrieval is usually decided only after fine-tuning and downstream evaluation. We propose $\mathrm{ECI}_{\mathrm{sem}}$, a semantic residual variant of Effective Contrastive Information (ECI) that ranks candidate negative sources using frozen target-encoder embeddings. $\mathrm{ECI}_{\mathrm{sem}}$ is training-free, not label-free: each scored example requires a query, a labeled positive, and an...
Evaluating Factual Density in Multi-Source RAG: A Study in Medical AI Accuracy
arXiv:2605.31506v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is the current industry standard for grounding AI in real-world facts. Traditional retrieval methods rely on keyword matching and topic proximity, ranking content based on how closely it sounds like the user's query. What they do not measure is how many verified facts the content actually contains.