Home Science Experimental Validation of Skull Acoustic Modelling...
Science

Experimental Validation of Skull Acoustic Modelling Strategies for Transcranial Focused Ultrasound Simulation: A Cross-Comparison Study

Key Points

arXiv:2606.09497v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Accurate acoustic modelling of the skull is essential for simulation-guided transcranial focused ultrasound (tFUS), but commonly used skull parameterisation strategies differ in complexity and reported accuracy. This study experimentally compared five k-Wave skull models: two voxel-wise linear mapping models, two three-layer models, and one single-layer fixed-parameter model. Nineteen regions of interest from five historical and two...

arXiv:2606.09497v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Accurate acoustic modelling of the skull is essential for simulation-guided transcranial focused ultrasound (tFUS), but commonly used skull parameterisation strategies differ in complexity and reported accuracy. This study experimentally compared five k-Wave skull models: two voxel-wise linear mapping models, two three-layer models, and one single-layer fixed-parameter model. Nineteen regions of interest from five historical and two Thiel-embalmed human skulls were tested at 220 kHz, 680 kHz, and 1000 kHz. Bowl-surface source fields were reconstructed using acoustic holography, and simulated intracranial pressure fields were benchmarked against needle-hydrophone measurements. Across frequencies, mean peak-pressure errors ranged from 20% to 31%, whereas intensity errors reached 41% to 77%. Errors in -6 dB focal volume ranged from 11% to 67%, and focal-position discrepancies were typically several millimetres. Simulations generally predicted smaller insertion losses than measured, indicating a tendency to underestimate skull-related attenuation and overestimate transmitted intracranial exposure. The linear mapping model with fixed attenuation gave the lowest frequency-averaged pressure error, but no model showed a consistent advantage across all metrics. These results show that current skull models can reproduce gross intracranial beam patterns while retaining substantial quantitative uncertainty in exposure, focal coverage, and target localisation.
Skull Acoustic Modelling Strategies (ORG) Cross-Comparison Study (ORG) k-Wave (ORG) Thiel-embalmed (PERSON)
Originally published by arXiv Physics Read original →