Science
Feedback Linearization and Control of a Grid-Forming Power Converter in an Islanded Microgrid
Key Points
Announce Type: new Abstract: In an islanded setting, grid-forming inverters must regulate their terminal voltage without support from an external grid, even though the load current depends directly on that voltage. The usual approach is a cascaded proportional--integral (PI) controller, built on a fast inner current loop and a slower outer voltage loop, with feedforward terms used to compensate dq rotational coupling. However, this compensation is only exact at the operating point where the...
arXiv:2606.07961v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: In an islanded setting, grid-forming inverters must regulate their terminal voltage without support from an external grid, even though the load current depends directly on that voltage. The usual approach is a cascaded proportional--integral (PI) controller, built on a fast inner current loop and a slower outer voltage loop, with feedforward terms used to compensate dq rotational coupling. However, this compensation is only exact at the operating point where the controller is tuned. This tutorial presents an alternative based on full-state feedback linearization. It is shown that the islanded inverter model has full relative degree, which allows exact state-space linearization with no internal or zero dynamics. A single feedback law cancels the main nonlinear effects; rotational coupling, resistive drops, and load conductance, so that the closed-loop system behaves like two independent double integrators. A standard pole-placement design is then used to shape the response. The controller is tested in MATLAB against a cascaded PI baseline under identical conditions at a 20 MW operating point, including reference tracking, load step disturbances, and parameter mismatch. The feedback-linearizing controller settles a reference step in 0.76 ms, while the PI controller does not reach the 2 % band within 50 ms. The cascaded PI controller shows better robustness to filter parameter mismatch due to its inner-loop integral action, which reduces steady-state errors under modeling uncertainty. Overall, the performance improvement and the robustness trade-off both come directly from the controller structures, rather than from tuning choices.