Supreme Court lets construction continue on Trump's $558m ballroom

Supreme Court lets White House continue construction on Trump's $558 million ballroom In short: The Supreme Court has voted 5-4 in favour of allowing the White House to continue construction on a $558 million ballroom project. The majority did not decide the legality of the project, but found a preservation group likely did not have the legal right to challenge it. What's next? The lawsuit will return to lower courts, but documents say that key portions of the project could be complete within months. A divided Supreme Court has allowed the White House to continue construction on a $US400 million ($558 million) ballroom project as lawsuits play out, a win for US President Donald Trump as he exercises unprecedented executive power and remakes the capital in his image. The apparent 5-4 decision replaces a temporary order issued earlier this month, shortly before a court-ordered halt would have gone into effect. The temporary order was signed by Chief Justice John Roberts, assigned to handle appeals from the capital. But he publicly disagreed with the latest decision, writing a strong dissent that referenced historical figures and called the project "likely unlawful" because it has not been approved by Congress. "Today's decision is no victory for the separation of powers," Chief Justice Roberts wrote. The court's three liberal-leaning justices agreed. The majority did not decide the legality of the project, but found a preservation group likely did not have the legal right to challenge it. The unsigned opinion also cited the national security concerns that the government says the project would address. The lawsuit will return to lower courts, but documents say that key portions of the project could be complete within months, a quick timeline compared with a typical legal case. The Trump administration asked the justices to intervene after federal courts found the project must halt because it did not have congressional approval. The lawsuit from the National Trust for Historic Preservation argued that Mr Trump has no unilateral authority to undertake the work, which has included demolishing the East Wing. The group's lawyers accused the White House of trying to "outrun the courts" by accelerating construction. In lower courts, the administration has argued that the US president has total authority to renovate the White House and other federal buildings. Government lawyers said the ballroom project must be completed due to national security concerns, though those were not an initial focus when Mr Trump announced the work he said would be funded by private donations. The administration has said crews are working 20 hours a day on the planned 8,400-square-metre ballroom. The framework is expected to be completed in November and much of the facade done by April, with full completion slated for August 2028, according to court documents. US District Judge Richard Leon ordered a stop to aboveground construction of the planned ballroom in April, though the order would allow work on bunkers and military installations below ground to continue. Judge Leon was nominated by president George W Bush, a Republican. The ruling was suspended but later upheld by a divided appeals court panel. Two judges appointed by Democratic presidents found the project was for Congress to decide and "not a matter for Executive self-help". A third judge, appointed by Mr Trump, found that the preservationist group that challenged the project had no legal right to sue. Solicitor-General D John Sauer also made that argument to the justices and said the decision halting the work was "extraordinary and unlawful". He said the completion of the project was "vitally required by national security". The Trump administration has scored a series of other victories on the high court's emergency docket, though the justices have ruled against some of the president's signature policies after fuller review. AP